Undersøkte litt mer, og dette produktet har jeg ingen tro på i det hele tatt. Oppfinneren virker totalt useriøst, og slenger om seg med udokumenterte og tvilsomme påstander. Jeg antok artikkelen til dagbladet fremstilte teknologien feil, men samme bs er å finne på hjemmesiden til ERW:
The physics behind the ERW is similar to that of a garage door. Even though a garage door weighs several hundred pounds, when it is sprung by the use of springs, it becomes de-weighted. So when you lift it, it only feels like it weighs a few pounds. In summary, an object that is sprung requires dramatically less energy to move than an unsprung object. In addition to the use of springs, an object can be sprung by stretching rubber. Scientists call this “Elastic Potential Energy.” At the center of the ERW is a layer of rubber. Through the use of adjustable rods, the rubber is stretched which stores elastic potential energy in the wheel, turning the ERW into a 360-degree slingshot that retains energy (hence the term “Energy Return Wheel”). When the ERW is attached to an object, that object becomes sprung. Just like a garage door that is sprung, the attached object becomes de-weighted and requires dramatically less energy to move than an unsprung object.
Luftløs-konseptet til Michelin (tweel) er annerledes på mange måter. Men heller ikke det fungerer særlig bra på biler eller tradisjonelle sykler (noe Michelin heller ikke påstår).
